Who is smarter, human being or artificial intelligence(AI, 人工智能)? The question swept the world a few

Passage 33(2018荆州)

Who is smarter, human being or artificial intelligence(AI, 人工智能)? The question swept the world a few months ago. In March 2018, AlphaGo, an AI program developed by Google, had the Go(围棋) match with Lee Sedol, a South Korean Go player. He is the world top player of this old Chinese game.
In October 2015, AlphaGo became the first computer program to beat a professional(职业的)human Go player. And this time, it beat Lee Sedol 4-1.
In fact, before the match, most people believed that Lee would certainly be the winner, because they didn't think that AI was good enough to beat the human mind. However, the result was disappointing. As a machine, AlphaGo would never get tired, while Lee Sedol was only a human and humans must have some weaknesses.
AlphaGo's wins over a human champion(冠军) show that computers can do more difficult tasks. Some people may worry whether computers are now smart enough to beat us at everything. But scientists say that is not the case. Real life problems can be more difficult than the Go game. Thomas Johnson, a scientist of AI said, “It's not hard to get a computer program to remember and produce facts. What is hard is getting computers to use knowledge in everyday situation.” And we believe we can use the technology of AI to improve the world.
( )1. The match between AlphaGo and Lee Sedol is mentioned at the beginning of the article mainly to ________.
A. get the reader to think about AI
B. draw the reader's attention to AlphaGo
C. show how AI is usually tested
D. tell the reader AI has over the human brain
( )2. What was the result of the match?
A. Google program beat AlphaGo.  
B. Lee Sedol won AlphaGo 4-1.
C. Lee Sedol was beaten.  
D. Neither side won the match.
( )3. —Why did most people believe Lee would be the winner?
—Because ________.
A. computers had weaknesses and also got tired
B. AlphaGo only beat a human Go player once
C. the Go game was invented by Chinese people
D. computers were not so smart as a human
( )4. What does Thomas Johnson probably agree with?
A. AI does better than humans in every situation.
B. It's hard for AI to beat the human at everything.
C. The development of AI could be harmful one day.
D. AI should be used to help us make difficult decisions.
【主旨大意】介绍了AlphaGo人工智能打败了韩国围棋高手李世石的事件,由此引发人们对人工智能的看法。
1.A【解析】推理判断题。题干意为:在文章开头,提及AlphaGo和李世石之间的比赛主要是。文章开始提及AlphaGo和李世石进行围棋比赛,并赢得比赛,最后谈到了科学家对人工智能的看法和“我们”看好人工智能技术的未来,可知是为了让读者思考人工智能。故选A。  2. C【解析】细节理解题。题干意为:比赛的结果是什么?根据第二段最后一句“And this time, it beat lee Sedol 4­1.”可知AlphaGo打败了李世石。故选C。
1.D【解析】推理判断题。题干意为“为什么多数人相信李会赢?”“因为。”根据第三段第一句“...because they didn't think that AI was good enough to beat the human mind.”可知选项D与之相符。故选D。
2.B【解析】推理判断题。题干意为:托马斯·约翰逊可能同意什么?根据最后一段中“What is hard is getting computers to use knowledge in everyday situation.”由此推知选项B与之相符。故选B。
 
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码: